Supreme Court as the guardian of the Indian Constitution

Supreme Court as the guardian of the Indian Constitution

QUES . Critically examine the role of the Supreme Court as the guardian of the Indian Constitution. UPSC IES/ISS EXAM 2020 General Studies. 200 Words. 5 Marks

HINTS:

Supreme Court at the apex of the Indian Judiciary is the highest authority to uphold the Constitution of India, to protect the rights and liberties of the citizens, and to uphold the values of rule of law. Hence, it is known as the Guardian of our Constitution.

The role of the Supreme Court is essential in the constitutional system in India. The most important responsibility is to ensure that laws are fairly administered and to make sure that no citizen is denied justice by any court in the country.

Must read: Judicial Activism – a critical appraisal

It is the biggest tribunal that has to draw the line between individual rights and society’s strength. It acts as the “guardian of social reform”.

Supreme Court also serves as a unifying factor in the country. It ensures perfection in constitutional, civil and criminal laws. It’s like in fact “the cement that has held the entire federal structure together”. Therefore, it is expected to serve as the Federation’s balance wheel.

Must read: Writ jurisdictions of the Supreme Court and High Court

The Supreme Court can be labeled as the Constitution’s defender hence it can be regarded as the guardian of the constitution as well as the people it governs, and their rights. It has the power of judicial review to interpret the Constitution and protect people’s liberties.

Must read: Collegium System – Definition, Advantages and Disadvantages

The Supreme Court of India has successfully served as the Constitution’s guardian since 1950 as shown by issuing landmark decisions in A. K. Gopalan vs. the State of Madras, Dr. Pratap Singh vs. the State of Punjab, K. M. Nanavati vs. the State of Bombay, and others. It acted with great bravery when it declared the Bihar Zamindari Abolition Act to be ultra vires. To make the abolition of Zamindari legal, the Parliament had to amend the Constitution.

Must read: Difference between judicial activism and judicial overreach

Since 1950, the Supreme Court has demonstrated that its judges have acted with dignity, impartiality and independence. As the concept of public interest litigation emerged, the role of the Supreme court has been expanded further.

External link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_India

Related Posts

Influence of Indian Politics and Culture on South East Asia

QUES. Discuss the influence of Indian politics and culture on South East Asia during the ancient period. UPSC IES/ISS EXAM 2026. General Studies. 200 Words. 5 Marks….

Comparison of Mauryan Municipal Administration with today’s Municipality

QUES. Compare the Mauryan Municipal Administration with today’s Municipality. UPSC IES/ISS EXAM 2026. General Studies. 200 Words. 5 Marks. HINTS: The Mauryan Empire featured a highly sophisticated…

SDGs and Building Inclusive and Sustainable Cities

QUES. The SDGs are urgent calls to action. Explain SDG 1, 5 and 11 in terms of building inclusive and sustainable cities. UPSC IES/ISS EXAM 2026. General…

Akbar’s attitude towards women

QUES. What was Akbar’s attitude towards women? UPSC IES/ISS EXAM 2024 General Studies. 200 Words. 5 Marks. HINTS: Akbar’s attitude towards women was indeed a complex mix…

Changes Introduced in the Domain of Centre-State Relations

QUES . What changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations? Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the…

Application of Constitutional Morality to Ensure Balance Between Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability

QUES . “Constitutional morality is the fulcrum which acts as an essential check upon the high functionaries and citizens alike…”In view of the above observation of the…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!