Charter Act of 1853 – the last of the series of Charter Acts

This was the last of the series of Charter Acts passed by the British Parliament between 1793 and 1853. It was a significant constitutional landmark.

Features of Charter Act of 1853

(a) It separated, for the first time, the legislative and executive functions of the Governor-General’s council.

(b) It provided for addition of six new members called legislative councillors to the council. In other words, it established a separate Governor-General’s legislative council which came to be known as the Indian (Central) Legislative Council.

(c) The legislative wing of the Indian (Central) Legislative council functioned as a mini- Parliament, adopting the same procedures as the British Parliament. Thus, legislation, for the first time, was treated
as a special function of the government, requiring special machinery and special process.

(d) It introduced an open competition system of selection and recruitment of civil servants. The covenanted civil service was, thus, thrown open to the Indians also. Accordingly, the Macaulay Committee (the Committee on the Indian Civil Service) was appointed in 1854.

(e) It extended the Company’s rule and allowed it to retain the possession of Indian territories on trust for the British Crown. But, it did not specify any particular period, unlike the previous Charters. This was a clear indication that the Company’s rule could be terminated at any time the Parliament liked.

(f) It introduced, for the first time, local representation in the Indian (Central) Legislative Council. Of the six new legislative members of the Governor General’s council, four members were appointed by the local (provincial) governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal and Agra.

(g) The strength of the Court of Directors was reduced to 18.

(h) The law member became the full member of the governor general’s executive council.

PRACTICE QUESTIONS

QUES . Which one of the following statements is not correct?

(a) The Charter Act of 1853 was enacted in the wake of a timely renewal of 20 years for each Charter Act.

(b) The number of members of the Court of Directors was reduced from 24 to 15 of which 6 were to be
nominated by the Crown.

(c) The Act renewed the powers of the Company and allowed it to retain the possession of Indian territories in trust for the British Crown but not for any specified period.

(d) The centralised power was given a thought in this Act, with contemplation of divided power for separate ruling.

(b) As the time approached for the renewal of the Company’s Charter, there was a growing demand that the Double Government of the Company in England should be ended. The demand was made for good, reasons, viz., that the Court of Directors had outlived its usefulness and that the existence of the Court of Directors and the Board of Control only resulted in unnecessary delay in the dispatch of business and undue expenditure. The Charter Act of 1853 provided that British India would remain under the administration of the Company in trust for the Crown until Parliament should decide otherwise.

Related Posts

Attorney General of India : Responsibilities, Rights and Limitations

QUES . “The Attorney General of India plays a crucial role in guiding the legal framework of the Union Government and ensuring sound governance through legal counsel.”…

Growth of Public Interest Litigation in India

QUES . Explain the reasons for the growth of public interest litigation in India. As a result of it, has the Indian Supreme Court emerged as the…

The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety

QUES . “The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety.” Comment. UPSC MAINS 2024…

Role of Local Bodies in Providing Good Governance at Local Level

QUES . Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons of merging the rural local…

Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025

The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 aims to provide a legal framework for the removal of the Prime Minister, Union ministers, chief ministers and…

Difference Between Civil and Criminal Cases

The distinction between civil and criminal law is fundamental in India’s legal system. They differ in terms of their purpose, parties involved, and procedure. What are Civil…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!